Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 7:33:16 GMT
If SPAK is taking MP A. Bllako to prison with the controversial argument that his father was rewarded for unfinished work in a private company that was selected under his leadership, the following clarifications cannot automatically be excluded. 1. The works of construction and administration of such a work with public money (incinerators) are reflected in the relevant situations. That is, the incurred expenses, only those that are provided for in the concession contract, are liquidated (paid) from the state budget. Any other expenditure, which is not foreseen in the cost of the construction work and its management, cannot legally be paid from the state budget.
The senior officials of the Ministry Brazil Telegram Number Data of Environment in the Investigative Commission declared that they did not do any verification of the execution of these expenses under the argument that this is the work of the supervisors. Then here the first question arises: if SPAK has found traces of shipments for unfinished work in the amount of 4 million Euros in the case of the former boss of Mr. Block and about 150 thousand Euros for Mr. Block through the father's payment for unfinished work, why aren't the supervisors who certified the unfinished works, thus damaging the state coffers, investigated and prosecuted? The same thing is related to the complete absence of two incinerators, to payments for trips outside the country, etc.
Different sources talk about millions of Euros spent to buy the mass media or to financially compensate a number of commentators as part of the government's propaganda machine. I do not believe that state institutions, such as the Ministry of Economy and Finance, would have been so crazy as to approve such expenses in the cost of individual incinerator projects, even under the name of the promotion for which it turns out that they were spent. Read also: The Champions League is back, Inter's possible line-up against Atlético The opposition protests, Rama leaves the country Then the natural question is: Is SPAK investigating in this direction, that is, both for the responsibility of the official parties involved (if they have allowed forecasts of such cost zeros that are not related to the purpose of the concession) and for the obligation of the parties to return money stolen "by law" in the state budget.
The senior officials of the Ministry Brazil Telegram Number Data of Environment in the Investigative Commission declared that they did not do any verification of the execution of these expenses under the argument that this is the work of the supervisors. Then here the first question arises: if SPAK has found traces of shipments for unfinished work in the amount of 4 million Euros in the case of the former boss of Mr. Block and about 150 thousand Euros for Mr. Block through the father's payment for unfinished work, why aren't the supervisors who certified the unfinished works, thus damaging the state coffers, investigated and prosecuted? The same thing is related to the complete absence of two incinerators, to payments for trips outside the country, etc.
Different sources talk about millions of Euros spent to buy the mass media or to financially compensate a number of commentators as part of the government's propaganda machine. I do not believe that state institutions, such as the Ministry of Economy and Finance, would have been so crazy as to approve such expenses in the cost of individual incinerator projects, even under the name of the promotion for which it turns out that they were spent. Read also: The Champions League is back, Inter's possible line-up against Atlético The opposition protests, Rama leaves the country Then the natural question is: Is SPAK investigating in this direction, that is, both for the responsibility of the official parties involved (if they have allowed forecasts of such cost zeros that are not related to the purpose of the concession) and for the obligation of the parties to return money stolen "by law" in the state budget.